Bloggingheads.tv

editor-in-chief Robert Wright
executive editor Brenda Talbot

Editorial

managing editor Sang Ngo
senior editors Aryeh Cohen-Wade
Sian Gibby
Philip Korsnes
associate editor Scott Shaffer

Production

technical consultant Greg Dingle
production manager Brian Degenhart
webmaster Milton Lawson

Co-founders

Robert Wright
Mickey Kaus
Greg Dingle

Founding supporters

Bob and Margie Rosencrans
Peter Post
Duke Usdan and Tara Litin
In-Suk Oh
Seung-Taek Oh
Chung-Taek Oh
Julie O. Ybarra
Alex Gibney
David desJardins
Henry and Eleanor O’Neill

What is Bloggingheads.tv?

Bloggingheads.tv, founded in 2005, was the first website devoted to split-screen video dialogues about politics and ideas. A central aspiration of the site was laid out in an early mission statement: “We hope to be in one sense an unusual expression of the Internet. Almost all blogs have a dominant ideology and a fairly homogeneous comments section to match. We pride ourselves on having a diversity of views in our diavlogs and an accordingly diverse comments section, where thoughtful disagreement is expressed in civil terms. (OK, usually thoughtful, and usually civil.)”

Since January of 2012, Bloggingheads has been operated by the Nonzero Foundation, whose name is, in a sense, an allusion to this mission. In game theory, a non-zero-sum game is a game that won’t necessarily produce a winner and a loser, but, rather, could have a win-win outcome or a lose-lose outcome. (For example: nuclear war is lose-lose, and peace in a nuclear age is win-win. Or, less dramatically: Sometimes liberals and conservatives are both better off compromising and reaching an agreement—that, say, keeps the government running—than failing to reach an agreement.) One common obstacle to reaching a win-win outcome is the failure of the participants to see things from the perspective of other participants. A primary mission of Bloggingheads, and the Nonzero Foundation, is to help people see things from perspectives other than their own—and, in particular, from perspectives that, for whatever reason, they aren’t normally able to appreciate.

This may mean helping Americans see world events from the perspective of non-Americans, or vice versa. And it may mean crossing various other divides—not just national but ideological, ethnic, cultural, religious, linguistic, gender, whatever.

These good intentions aren’t enough. If Bloggingheads didn’t do a good job of creating smart, engaging conversations about politics and ideas, it wouldn’t matter how many of those conversations crossed how many divides, because few people would watch them. That’s one reason we work hard to provide entertaining illumination—to shed revealing light on politics and policy, and the world of ideas construed broadly, in an atmosphere that favors candor, spontaneity and wit. Another reason we do this is because it’s what we enjoy doing.

And there’s a third reason we do this: Because we don’t think it gets done much. Yes, “real” TV features some vibrant, high-level conversations about politics and ideas. But the economics of broadcast and cable TV seem to mainly encourage something else. “Dialogue” on television is often an exchange of rehearsed talking points, and interviews are often a series of canned questions, with little or no impromptu follow-up. For all of the unscripted talk shows on broadcast and cable TV, there’s very little true spontaneity.

The distinction between online video and “real” TV is said to be disappearing. In the coming years, for more and more people, all video will be available on the big screen in the den, and the screen will be fully interactive. When this revolution is complete, we hope to be around and available in your den. But until then, we suspect, some of the most interesting and important TV will be found not on “real” TV but online. We try to be a good example.

bloggingheads.tv

Subscribe:

video rss feed audio rss feed
video podcast audio podcast faster audio podcast

February 2012

Feb 21  —  Conor Friedersdorf & Mark Oppenheimer

Mark talks about his recent profile of Maggie Gallagher, a leading opponent of gay marriage. He and Conor agree that legal gay marriage is both inevitable  and probably a good thing. They disagree about who truly speaks for Catholics. Conor calls for abandoning the norm that says "objective journalists" should hide their opinions, while Mark sees value in it. Is it always best to be charitable toward one's ideological opponents? They conclude by debating whether homeschooling is bad for a liberal society.

Feb 20  —  Sarah Posner & Emily Belz

On The Posner Show, Sarah asks political reporter Emily Belz: what was Darrell Issa thinking? While many political observers look at the GOP's anti-contraception crusade as an electoral loser, Christian conservatives see their "religious liberty" framing as a long game, mapped out in the Manhattan Declaration, that will play out well beyond 2012. In the GOP primary, though, it seems to be helping Rick Santorum. Is his surge explained by evangelicals who buy Mike Huckabee's "we are all Catholics now?"  Plus: what Santorum means when he talks about spiritual warfare.

Feb 19  —  Glenn Loury & John McWhorter

Glenn and John begin by debating the merits of Coming ApartCharles Murray's new book on the "white underclass." John likes the book's focus on the importance of culture; Glenn acknowledges that culture matters while rejecting Murray's conclusion that public policy can do little to help the poor.  They also debate whether the ascendancy of a black president has led to more emphasis on class and less on race in political discourse. Glenn and John next discuss controversial remarks about gays by CNN's Roland Martin. They go on to debate the moral status of religiously founded beliefs that homosexuality is immoral.  

Feb 17  —  Chris Moody & Matt K. Lewis

Matt and guest-host Chris Moody recap the scene at CPAC and relate whether Matt successfully avoided his thousands of adoring fans. They discuss how opposing the payroll tax cut was like a rat's head in the GOP's coke can, and marvel at the incredible rehabilitation of Rick Santorum. Is Santorum right to claim that he's the conservative alternative to Romney? And are Tim Pawlenty and Mike Huckabee kicking themselves right now?  

Feb 16  —  Conn Carroll & Jaime Fuller

On this week's episode of Pros and Conn, Jaime Fuller talks about whether the payroll tax deal is a win for both sides, debates Obama's budget and the Buffett Rule, and wonders if Rick Santorum could actually win this thing.

Feb 15  —  Robert Farley & Mark Leon Goldberg

On Foreign Entanglements, Rob and Mark Leon Goldberg discuss the latest events in Syria, and the repercussions of recent developments at the United Nations. They ponder the reasoning behind Russia's commitment to Syria, on both military and diplomatic fronts. Mark and Rob then explore the expanding writ of the International Criminal Court—is it making authoritarian leaders more reluctant to give up power? Finally, they consider the parallels between Syria and Bahrain and the future of the Responsibility to Protect.

Feb 14  —  Conor Friedersdorf & Noah Millman

Noah and Conor kick things off by debating the Catholic Church, health insurance, and contraception. Is this a manufactured controversy, or are lay Catholics earnestly upset by a loss of religious liberty? Noah is a Jewish liberal living in New York City—so what is he doing writing for The American Conservative? Conor wonders whether the GOP should embrace TAC's radical critique of American foreign policy. Charles Murray's new book Coming Apart receives some harsh criticism, as does the right's politics of symbolic victimization. Plus: who will Noah and Conor be voting for in November?  

Feb 13  —  Sarah Posner & Sarah Wildman

On the first episode of The Posner Show, Sarah Posner and Sarah Wildman discuss how framing Iran's nuclear ambitions as an existential threat assists fundamentalists, both Jewish and Christian. They also worry that the Republican presidential hopefuls rely more on myth than fact when discussing Middle East policy. How has casino magnate Sheldon Adelson so effectively shaped public opinion both in the US and Israel? And Newt Gingrich trivia: he narrowly averted an intifada, and took evangelizing lessons from a Messianic Jew.

Feb 12  —  Glenn Loury & Larry Kotlikoff

Glenn introduces Larry Kotlikoff, professor of economics and — unbeknownst to you, perhaps — presidential candidate. Larry tells Glenn why it's so hard for a president to get good economic advice, and they talk about the juicy political gossip in Ron Suskind's book, Confidence Men. Larry lays out his non-partisan positions: he wants to reform health care insurance, strengthen the financial system, and get serious with Iran.

Feb 10  —  Bill Scher & Matt K. Lewis

Under discussion this week: Why Matt won't talk to you at CPAC. Will conservatives get on the Santorum train? Why Romney lives or dies by the monthly jobs reports. Can Romney govern without a philosophy? And Matt and Bill get a little testy over contraception and explore the political fallout from Obama's decision.

Feb 09  —  Conn Carroll & Joan McCarter

This week on Pros and Conn, Joan McCarter appears to talk about what the results of "Pseudo Tuesday" really mean, the scene at the Conservative Political Action Conference, Republicans in disarray over renewing the payroll tax cut, and vengeance vs. the rule of law in the foreclosure fraud settlement.

Feb 08  —  Matthew Duss & Jamie Fly

On Foreign Entanglements, Jamie makes the case for bombing Iran's regime out of existence. Some key questions are considered: Do Iranians support their country's nuclear program? Would Iranians favor an attack on their own country? Are Iranians pro-American? Matt concludes by arguing that Obama's just not that into war with Iran.

Feb 08  —  Conor Friedersdorf & Phoebe Connelly

Conor and Phoebe delve into the controversy surrounding the Susan G. Komen Foundation and Planned Parenthood, and how social media is changing grassroots campaigning. They deconstruct so-called "lady blogs" like Jezebel that are targeted at women and discuss the social-media site Pinterest and the curious backlash against it. Conor reveals his engagement and offers a critique of the wedding-industrial complex. And Phoebe concludes by musing on the strange online meta-debate about the musician Lana Del Rey.

Feb 06  —  Glenn Loury & Harold Pollack

Harold Pollack joins Glenn for a discussion of social policy. Newt Gingrich's proposal to employ poor kids as janitors is discussed, and Harold stresses the importance of social skills for poor kids by citing evidence from his work in Chicago. Glenn reminisces about growing up on Chicago's South Side, and Harold expresses alarm at how the economic crisis has devastated the black middle class there. Harold and Glenn also talk about Mitt Romney's concern for the poor, or lack thereof.

Feb 05  —  Robert Wright & Matthew Lee

Bloggingheads United Nations correspondent Matthew Lee reports on the vetoed Syria resolution and the behind-the-scenes machinations that led to its failure. Bob wonders if the world would be better off with a "get out of jail free" card for deposed dictators. Plus, Matthew has a shocking report on a Sri Lankan war criminal becoming a UN peacekeeping advisor, which leads him to inveigh against the UN's lack of accountability.

Feb 03  —  Bill Scher & Matt K. Lewis

This week, on The Program Formerly Known as TWiB: Why Matt is dreading going to the Conservative Political Action Conference. How will the CPAC crowd respond to the presidential candidates? Will Romney run right or run center in the general? And Bill and Matt try to figure out why Ann Coulter, Matt Drudge, and Jennifer Rubin all seem to be in the tank for Romney.

Feb 03  —  Robert Farley & Heather Hurlburt

On Foreign Entanglements, Rob and Heather talk about the tightening of sanctions on Iran, including the domestic repercussions in both countries. They also discuss the situation in Syria: Rob has doubts about airpower, and Heather and Rob work through some of the problems with the Responsibility to Protect. Plus, a mini-review of "Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy."

Feb 02  —  Conn Carroll & Armando Llorens

On this week's episode of Pros and Conn, Talk Left's Big Tent Democrat (aka Armando Llorens) talks about Romney's win in Florida, how Cubans think about immigration, why Romney doesn't care about poor people, and the power of Erick Erickson and Markos Moulitsas.

Feb 01  —  Adam Serwer & Daniel Foster

Adam and Dan assess whether the Florida effectively ended the GOP race, and whether immigration reform is effectively DOA. Should we, unlike Mitt Romney, worry about the very poor? Dan call b.s. on both Occupy Wall Street and Romney. Plus: hip-hop as the purest expression of American capitalism.